I knew that I heard this before:
...still further, and blows both Class::Accessor::Fast and Class::Accessor::Faster out of the water.
Do you mean like this: http://img.geocaching.com/user/ac12d897-6d3c-41de-8696-c88fcb516acc.jpg?rnd=0.7322909 ?
;-)
McA
In reply to Re^2: [OT] Problem with Class::Accessor::Faster
by McA
in thread Problem with Class::Accessor::Faster
by jmmitc06
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |