The commercial volume is too small to pay off legal advice. The payment is not my motivation.
They already have loads of content in other languages and I think Perl should be presented too.
> or that they can have it with but in the latter case it will cost them substantially more because you will not be able to base it upon the works of others.
That's already my approach, just wanted to learn more about licences.
From another perspective:
If I were a modules author I would not object to the reuse of code in the tutorial section.
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery
FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice
In reply to Re^2: Open source code and copyright
by LanX
in thread Open source code and copyright
by LanX
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |