So, it looks like there are plenty of use cases ;)
Iff you dont need backwards compatibility
In reply to Re^6: RFC: "assignary" operator ?= : (compatibility)
by Anonymous Monk
in thread RFC: "assignary" operator ?= :
by richard.sharpe
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |