> what happens if get_second gets called first?
I suppose my application will reject the request because the cookie was not set; is my mojo DWIM? But this is not importatnt at the moment.
I still miss the meaning of this sugar called under and I read about it. I cant capacitate how your example can be similar to others in this thread where syntax like my $foo = $r->under('/foo')->to('foo#baz'); are presented like in the docs.
How other examples in this thread can use under in a total different way?
With your comment with the following, all following routes require a logged-in user and a proper cookie you mean that if some route is positioned in the file after an under one, this is executed? Like as it was a pragma no strict usage?
Sincerily I found this option highly unreadable: or, as you have done, you put a BIG comment stating it clear, or after 100 lines everyone forget the under is in use. I see you can group routes using under and sounds saner... but I miss the sense of the code presented in the example.. ( the route is /admin/dashboard or /dashboard ??)
Anyway thanks a lot to you and to all others contributors of this thread
L*
In reply to Re^4: first steps with Mojolicious::Lite -- under
by Discipulus
in thread first steps with Mojolicious::Lite
by Discipulus
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |