I can't tell which other test besides is_deeply doesn't provide a negation.
From Test::More I would offer:
none of which have a negative. Technically ok doesn't have a negative either but the trivial workaround of negating the argument should be sufficient for that one.
🦛
In reply to Re^7: Inverting test conditions in Test::More ?
by hippo
in thread Inverting test conditions in Test::More ?
by LanX
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |