I totally agree what you point out on the update. ;) what I want to empasize is the declaration of our acatually means declaring a alias to a a pkg variable, not declare a package variable itself.
I am trying to improve my English skills, if you see a mistake please feel free to reply or /msg me a correction
In reply to Re^3: PadWalker's closed_over - but for our variables? (update: "declaration")
by xiaoyafeng
in thread PadWalker's closed_over - but for our variables?
by LanX
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |