At first I didn't understand what you meant by linking to this other thread. But now I've joined pieces together:
I'm not saying you're implying anything (as you might just be pointing something related that might help, in fact I believe that's the case), but anyway I'd like to mention I'm not that anonymous monk, as I'm aware it could be understood as duplicating threads somehow, which is not cool.
In reply to Re^2: Should I use v5.10 because of named groups?
by hrcerq
in thread Should I use v5.10 because of named groups?
by hrcerq
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |