Many thanks, that explains a lot. :)
I'd rather call this an SQL abstraction.
It's much like SQL::Abstract and allows to cover (almost?) all semantics of SQL queries.
But yeah, like I said I'm strongly associating ORM to "Active Records" and the resulting limitations.
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery
In reply to Re^2: Terminology: Is DBIx::Class an ORM?
by LanX
in thread Terminology: Is DBIx::Class an ORM?
by LanX
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |