Why do you think there's something wrong with Const::Fast? (There is a caveat listed in the docs, though.)
In reply to Re^6: Readonly vs ReadonlyX (updated PC-Source + Const::Fast)
by ikegami
in thread Readonly vs ReadonlyX
by rlauer
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |