This needs context:
I remember people refusing to use the "new" Netscape (or even Mosaic) back then and sticking with a pure text browser like Lynx, w3m or Emacs for years...
It resonates to me now that I forbid cookies and JavaScript by default in http. This involves going thru extra complications to add exceptions for certain sites like Perlmonks.
That's of course not a 100% solution, because some sites simply won't work without me having to accept wastes of bandwidth, lag, stolen performance and attacks on privacy.¹
Gemini - without having read all specifications for the protocol -sounds like a way to me to guarantee by restrictions that all sites comply to textual browsability.
Tho I'm sceptical...
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
see Wikisyntax for the Monastery
1) For example: I'm specifically avoiding MSN News because they automatically play videos, and my android browsers have no options to forbid this.
In reply to Re: Technobabble (was: Re: Adding recognition of Gemini to URI.pm?)
by LanX
in thread Adding recognition of Gemini to URI.pm?
by mldvx4
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |