Couldn't check janitation or moderation history because they timed out.
If it wasn't caused by a moderator it's either an automatic anti-spam/abuse mechanism or a glitch because of the currently excessive load (or most likely a combination of both)
Anyway, you are long enough around here (20 years!), why don't you check all of this by yourself before using such a "deplorable" title???
And please don't use links that log us out.
Finally could have a look into moderation history aka displaytype=approvalhistory; ...
... some(thing/one) tried to move the node to a non-existent section. This kind of action is certainly a reason for locking.
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
see Wikisyntax for the Monastery
In reply to Re: Perlmonks: How deplorable can it get ?
by LanX
in thread Perlmonks: How deplorable can it get ?
by syphilis
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |