Essentially it is "done".
So no CGI v5? Well, I guess the advocates of backward compatibility will be happier. But in any case thank you for taking care of a module that will probably stay with us for a while longer :-)
BTW, perhaps better terms would be "mature" or even "legacy"...
In reply to Re^2: Is CGI.pm dead?
by Anonymous Monk
in thread Is CGI.pm dead?
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |