That all looks fine and consistent to me. I don't see Tie::IxHash as a particularly compelling driver, although I concede that using something common as a template is better than just inventing stuff. However, consistency in a name space (i.e. with MCE::Shared::Hash) is better still.
In reply to Re^5: MCE::OrdHash naming Push and Unshift methods supporting merging and reordering
by GrandFather
in thread MCE::OrdHash naming Push and Unshift methods supporting merging and reordering
by marioroy
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |