Again, anyway, I tended to read Ovid's suggestion in the light of robustness (where it seems to be adequate) instead of readabiliy, that's why I went down at the microscopic level. I understand that after reading too many suggestions like these you might snap though :)
perl -ple'$_=reverse' <<<ti.xittelop@oivalf
Io ho capito... ma tu che hai detto?In reply to Re^5: What am I not understanding about $,
by polettix
in thread What am I not understanding about $,
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |