Survey was okay. Results seem overall positive. I was a bit irritated that “vim” and “Atom” were on the multiple choice for IDEs while things like “Emacs” and “TextMate” (and as hippo mentioned, “Padre”) were not. Indicative of the tone of the survey to me. A little overly guided with some questions open to subjective interpretation. Still, nicely presented results and always good to do publicity oriented / conversation starter stuff for Perl.
In reply to Re: Perl Developer Survey 2017 results are available
by Your Mother
in thread Perl Developer Survey 2017 results are available
by vrk
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |