OK, I'm putting together a test case now. It's turning out more complicated than I thought, but I'll post it here when I get it working.
I profiled this with NYTProf and it is indeed the pos()= pos() statement that is taking all the extra time. However, the exact conditions that trigger it are currently eluding me; I'll continue to isolate it.
In reply to Re^2: Is there a way to allow consecutive zero-length matches without using pos()?
by jsm
in thread Is there a way to allow consecutive zero-length matches without using pos()?
by jsm
For: | Use: | ||
& | & | ||
< | < | ||
> | > | ||
[ | [ | ||
] | ] |