Actually you didn't. :)
> question in the title and almost no content. OP msged
No mention of "reap:"
I'm always confused by considerations consisting of a why but without any what ?
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language and ☆☆☆☆ :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery
In reply to Re^5: Since when did "\N{U+5678}" work as an alternative to "\x{5678}"? -- good habits
by LanX
in thread Since when did "\N{U+5678}" work as an alternative to "\x{5678}"?
by daxim
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |