Hello Arunbear,
I probably didn't at the time of the grandparent post, but I did look it up since and abandoned contract in the name for good.
I don't think what I want is full-fledged DbC though. It's a bit "take it or leave it" - adding it to just some subs looks silly and adding it throughout an (already working) project seems like a bit of overkill and also a big and risky task.
In reply to Re^2: RFC: Test::Contract - extensible object-oriented runtime check series (DbC)
by Dallaylaen
in thread RFC: Test::Contract - extensible object-oriented runtime check series
by Dallaylaen
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |