I also think a mark (for logged in users that is) should have a more neutral wording.
Assuming that its "bad content" depends on the POV, that's why I suggested "Disputed:" (which fits into the "Reaped:" model)
Cheers Rolf
(addicted to the Perl Programming Language :)
Wikisyntax for the Monastery
FootballPerl is like chess, only without the dice
In reply to Re^2: RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors
by LanX
in thread RFC: Hide Very Bad Answers From Visitors
by jdporter
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |