If I had to guess, it looks like this could be the original code. The license is the 3-clause BSD license, without the advertising clause, so AFAICT it should be GPL compatible. But you might also want to try and get confirmation from iliapenev about what the original code was (maybe open an issue).
In reply to Re^3: Licensing clarification: Requiring a BSD licensed dist in a Perl licensed dist
by haukex
in thread Licensing clarification: Requiring a BSD licensed dist in a Perl licensed dist
by stevieb
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |