all databases I've looked at would need a ramdisk, since they don't support in-memory connections from multiple processes.
Doubtless I am misunderstanding here but does the memory engine of MariaDB not satisfy your requirements? I've used it for lower-latency stores in several projects (including FCGI-based access) without problems. Could you explain where this falls short for you?
In reply to Re: Sharing data "cache" between forked processes
by hippo
in thread Sharing data "cache" between forked processes
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |