Most monks don't bother editing the titles of their reply nodes. This isn't necessarily a horrible sin (or even a bad thing), but it does lead to nodes with titles of the form "Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: foo". All the "Re:"s distract from and dominate the subject, which sucks.

How about an option to collapse chains of "Re:"s into one, with a bracketed number to show the depth of that particular reply? The code doesn't have to be particularly intelligent: it could simply avoid messing with any title not of the form /(Re: )+original_title/, for instance. It's not a big thing, but judging by the number of monks who hand-hack their reply titles to do this, it might make a lot of people happy.

--
:wq

In reply to Feature request: Collapsing by FoxtrotUniform

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.