Um, not to be a complete dingus, but I'm a boy-monk, and I've never heard of "FHM." Checked out your site, and I haven't heard of most of these women, either. You kids and your damned new fangled Internet . . .
I thought some of the results in the FHM survey were quite dubious, so it will be interesting to see what results come up on the site.
Well, in a strictly statistical sense (and I'm no statistician, so please take those grains of salt as needed) I don't think that your results can ultimatly be used to comment on FHM's (whoever they are,) seeing as how there is no way to know if you are using comperable data sets (I mean, if I ask 100 bikers if my dog is prettier than your dog, and they vote for my dog, and then I go ask 130 beauticians and 617 Wall Street bankers, and they're all about your dog-- that won't prove that one dog is any prettier than the other (i mean, DOGS, for god's sake!), it just prove that bikers favor Dog A while beauticians and bankers favor Dog B.
Am I making any sense? All this dog talk is getting me sorta-- distracted, if you catch my meaning. Any possibility of you swapping your site over into a "100 most beautiful dogs site"? 'Cause if you do, I wanna put my dog in the running-- he's a real looker.)
But, so-- yeah, whatever.
The Autonomic Pilot; it's FunkyTown, babe.
In reply to RE: Sexiest Woman?
by mcwee
in thread Sexiest Woman?
by SuperCruncher
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |