I also recall japhy noting that the base module doesn't yet support all the really funky things[1] you can do with regexen. It's really a string parser and in general parsing regexes also reduces to requiring a Perl parser in Perl that isn't perl.
[1] - my definition of funky starts at (?{}) / (??{}) so maybe it's good for everything normal programmers use. ;-)
Fun Fun Fun in the Fluffy Chair
In reply to Re^2: Understanding someone else's parser
by diotalevi
in thread Understanding someone else's parser
by John M. Dlugosz
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |