I also don't see how it adds anything to the book (it's just a more long-winded explanation of what the book already clearly explains)
In reply to Re: S And M -- modifiers, that is...
by Anonymous Monk
in thread S And M -- modifiers, that is...
by Cody Pendant
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |