Rereading this, I should note that diotalevi's post was in all probability just a slightly careless joke and my response was a bit overboard. The main problem is the fact that a well intentioned question was removed because of very minor language errors.
In reply to Re: Re: Re: Specializing in a field
by Anonymous Monk
in thread Speicilizing a field
by NodeReaper
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |