I wouldn't bet a lot on someone here knowing what you mean by "training probabilistic trees". Can you be more verbose about what kind probabilistic tree that is and what you're trying to train?
At any rate, for any of your XML processing needs, XML::Twig is always worth a look.
Makeshifts last the longest.
In reply to Re: XML probabilistic trees (what's that)
by Aristotle
in thread XML probabilistic trees
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |