If you didn't need persistence, I would point you at IPC:MM, which has unbeatable performance.And that would disregard the portability requirement.
...These are faster than SQLite.But neither speaks SQL. You should only consider SQLite if your aim is to have a RDMS.
In reply to Re: Re: Concurrent access to temporary and persistant storage
by Anonymous Monk
in thread Concurrent access to temporary and persistant storage
by hacker
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |