No apoligies necessary, my comments weren't intended as critisism, just a note of the situation as I found it and an attempt to take the sting away from the OP who had failed to find the removeChild() call, which is indeed, fairly self-expanatory once you know it's there.
In reply to Re: Re: Re: XML::XPath
by BrowserUk
in thread XML::XPath
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |