I'm interested in doing it differently because I have in the order of 60 substitutions to do to as many variables. I may therefore have given the wrong impression by oversimplification but I feel that I have been given all the information I need to proceed with confidence, so I am very happy with the outcome.
Thanks to all who have provided input to this question.
jonnyfolkIn reply to Re: Bubba is Confused
by jonnyfolk
in thread multiple (different) substitutions on same $foo
by jonnyfolk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |