...well, each child is doing exactly the same thing immediately after the fork, so each one of those HASH(0x74fc2c) thingies is at the same address in the address space of each process, but not the same physical address. At least that is how I see it...
It suggests that memory allocation is very deterministic. :)
yours,
Michael
In reply to Re: Using DBI::clone()
by herveus
in thread Using DBI::clone()
by gnu@perl
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |