Well, I gave you the source, so you could have easily done this yourself. Now I had to first compile a threaded Perl (as I'm on a different machine now). Anyway, I modified the program so it does it all four times: fork and wait, fork with SIGCHLD being ignored, joining threads, and detachted threads, with labels Fw, Fi, Tj and Td. Not surprisingly, there's not much difference between Fw and Fi, and between Tj and Td.
Empty childs (Fw) 0: 0.01 user, 0.01 system, 0:00.02 elapsed (Fi) 0: 0.01 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.01 elapsed (Tj) 0: 0.05 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.06 elapsed (Td) 0: 0.05 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.06 elapsed (Fw) 5: 0.01 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.01 elapsed (Fi) 5: 0.02 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.02 elapsed (Tj) 5: 0.11 user, 0.02 system, 0:00.14 elapsed (Td) 5: 0.12 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.14 elapsed (Fw) 10: 0.01 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.03 elapsed (Fi) 10: 0.01 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.03 elapsed (Tj) 10: 0.20 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.24 elapsed (Td) 10: 0.21 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.24 elapsed (Fw) 25: 0.00 user, 0.06 system, 0:00.10 elapsed (Fi) 25: 0.01 user, 0.01 system, 0:00.09 elapsed (Tj) 25: 0.45 user, 0.47 system, 0:01.32 elapsed (Td) 25: 0.42 user, 0.04 system, 0:00.58 elapsed (Fw) 50: 0.01 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.11 elapsed (Fi) 50: 0.01 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.16 elapsed (Tj) 50: 0.86 user, 0.01 system, 0:01.07 elapsed (Td) 50: 0.79 user, 0.07 system, 0:01.00 elapsed (Fw) 100: 0.02 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.21 elapsed (Fi) 100: 0.01 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.35 elapsed (Tj) 100: 1.60 user, 0.12 system, 0:01.99 elapsed (Td) 100: 1.62 user, 0.08 system, 0:01.99 elapsed (Fw) 250: 0.01 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.50 elapsed (Fi) 250: 0.02 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.85 elapsed (Tj) 250: 4.20 user, 0.23 system, 0:05.18 elapsed (Td) 250: 4.28 user, 0.20 system, 0:05.22 elapsed (Fw) 500: 0.02 user, 0.00 system, 0:01.01 elapsed (Fi) 500: 0.02 user, 0.04 system, 0:01.73 elapsed (Tj) 500: 9.09 user, 0.56 system, 0:11.28 elapsed (Td) 500: 9.19 user, 0.46 system, 0:11.25 elapsed (Fw) 1000: 0.01 user, 0.01 system, 0:02.02 elapsed (Fi) 1000: 0.02 user, 0.12 system, 0:03.47 elapsed A thread exited while 48 threads were running. (Tj) 1000: 17.54 user, 14.73 system, 3:07.04 elapsed (Td) 1000: 22.57 user, 23.33 system, 4:38.73 elapsed Childs writing (Fw) 0: 0.03 user, 0.07 system, 0:01.50 elapsed (Fi) 0: 0.02 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.01 elapsed (Tj) 0: 0.03 user, 0.04 system, 0:00.83 elapsed (Td) 0: 0.05 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.06 elapsed (Fw) 5: 0.02 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.02 elapsed (Fi) 5: 0.01 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.02 elapsed (Tj) 5: 0.12 user, 0.02 system, 0:00.17 elapsed (Td) 5: 0.11 user, 0.02 system, 0:00.14 elapsed (Fw) 10: 0.01 user, 0.01 system, 0:00.03 elapsed (Fi) 10: 0.02 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.04 elapsed (Tj) 10: 0.19 user, 0.01 system, 0:00.23 elapsed (Td) 10: 0.20 user, 0.01 system, 0:00.26 elapsed (Fw) 25: 0.02 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.06 elapsed (Fi) 25: 0.01 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.09 elapsed (Tj) 25: 0.41 user, 0.04 system, 0:00.53 elapsed (Td) 25: 0.45 user, 0.01 system, 0:00.53 elapsed (Fw) 50: 0.01 user, 0.01 system, 0:00.11 elapsed (Fi) 50: 0.02 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.18 elapsed (Tj) 50: 0.81 user, 0.07 system, 0:01.03 elapsed (Td) 50: 0.79 user, 0.07 system, 0:01.01 elapsed (Fw) 100: 0.01 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.21 elapsed (Fi) 100: 0.02 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.34 elapsed (Tj) 100: 1.63 user, 0.11 system, 0:02.05 elapsed (Td) 100: 1.63 user, 0.09 system, 0:01.99 elapsed (Fw) 250: 0.02 user, 0.01 system, 0:00.52 elapsed (Fi) 250: 0.01 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.85 elapsed (Tj) 250: 4.22 user, 0.31 system, 0:05.29 elapsed (Td) 250: 4.28 user, 0.20 system, 0:05.24 elapsed (Fw) 500: 0.02 user, 0.00 system, 0:01.01 elapsed (Fi) 500: 0.01 user, 0.03 system, 0:01.71 elapsed (Tj) 500: 9.38 user, 0.51 system, 0:11.50 elapsed (Td) 500: 9.16 user, 0.54 system, 0:11.28 elapsed (Fw) 1000: 0.01 user, 0.00 system, 0:02.01 elapsed (Fi) 1000: 0.02 user, 0.13 system, 0:03.49 elapsed A thread exited while 51 threads were running. (Tj) 1000: 17.47 user, 15.01 system, 2:34.14 elapsed (Td) 1000: 22.57 user, 23.21 system, 5:01.54 elapsed

Abigail


In reply to Re: Why use threads over processes, or why use processes over threads? by Abigail-II
in thread Why use threads over processes, or why use processes over threads? by pg

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":



  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.