which ones do you think required anonymous posting?
if you were searching for answers and have a list of 100 nodes that matched your query what would cause you to select the given good content nodes above the other 20 anonymously authored nodes that match your search vs an author whom you know from experience has a wealth of knowledge concerning your query?
Anonymous does us all a disservice by hiding amongst the noise.
i'm not against anonymity, what i'm against is dilution of the individuality of those with whom i communicate. what makes Anonymous any more anonymous than jqrandomuser?
when you listen to the voices in your head do you listen to the ones you can tell apart and converse with or do you listen to the *one voice* that's incredibly schitzo?
what do you think the ratio of good/bad useful/trash gem/lump of coal posts tends towards for Anonymous? what will it be in the future when there are 20x the current number of Anonymous nodes?
let's take all of the best posts and change their attribution to Anonymous. do they loose value?
tag yourself with a moniker. fight for youself against the background noise. value yourself enough to make a pattern.
otherwise no matter how wonderful your insight may be it will be nothing but noise.
how about this, take the Anonymous replies, sort them by their approval rating, and change their owner to one of the ranked anonymous users...
In reply to Re: Re: Re: Re: No Anonymous Reply Option
by zengargoyle
in thread No Anonymous Reply Option
by artist
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |