On the debugging suggestion, you're right that that is a faster approach. It wasn't the one that immediately came to mind for me, but that's life.
Of course I still suspect that running through the file with Text::xSV, once, will find your error pretty fast if there is an error in the file.
In reply to Re: Re: DBD::CSV limitation versus aging/unmaintained modules (lazy)
by tilly
in thread DBD::CSV limitation versus aging/unmaintained modules
by Eyck
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |