Does everyone start with rev0 on their current sig (with rev1?). Will any change mean a new revision number?I had envisioned any change bumping the revision number. No opinion on the rev0 or rev1 (or even pure numeric 0 or 1) but everyone would start the same.
In reply to Re: Re: include revision number in sig class
by ysth
in thread include revision number in sig class
by ysth
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |