(re downvoting) There's no interaction.
The voting itself is interaction.
It's an expression that the post was so bad, it doesn't merit a reply.
Perhaps that is how you view downvotes. I do not. Usually when I downvote, I reply and tell what is wrong with the post (not saying anything about how I voted). UNLESS someone has already done so OR the post is just a stupid flame.
And you think that a reply is too subtle?
No, a reply is not subtle at all.
They really need a vote?
There is no question of *need* regarding XP or votes.
Just so you know, I didn't vote on your posts. But you do know what I think about them, don't you?
I can guess. You choose how you vote. I'm not saying any voting strategy is bad, as long as you vote for nodes, not people. You chose not to vote, I chose to vote. We both have our reasons for doing (or not doing) so. One of the reasons I vote for most replies is that I have plenty of votes to cast.
Juerd # { site => 'juerd.nl', plp_site => 'plp.juerd.nl', do_not_use => 'spamtrap' }
In reply to Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Increased number of downvotes at the Monastery?
by Juerd
in thread Increased number of downvotes at the Monastery?
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |