I don't find characters disappearing to be graceful enough
q tags don't represent characters; they're markup, metadata. (They may be represented _by_ characters, but that depends on the browser, the stylesheets in effect, and whatnot.)
Quote characters can have a significant effect on meaning.
So can italics, boldface, images, or lots of things. But q tags aren't used where a literal " character is wanted; we have entities for that. q tags are used for marking up a section of text; they are in principle similar to <cite> tags.
Some elitist label of "not modern" doesn't hold much sway with me.
I wouldn't make that argument if graceful degradation weren't one of the three or four most important aspects of the design of the web in the first place. Should mail servers not support CAPA because not all POP3 clients know how to use it? Or maybe the clients shouldn't attempt CAPA, since not all mail servers are guaranteed to support it? We're not talking here about taking functionality or information _away_ from people who use old software; we're talking about making previously-unavailable functionality or information available for people who use newer software that supports it; people who use software that doesn't will see the same thing they have been seeing.
In reply to Re: INS, DEL, Q tags now allowed in posts (graceful)
by jonadab
in thread INS, DEL, Q tags now allowed in posts
by ambrus
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |