I have a few change requests regarding the experience or the rating system->

1) Points should be alloted for replying to queries.

Well, as somebody already pointed out and as you verified by yourself such propoals tend to be heavily downvoted. Personally I don't see anything wrong with discussing the XP voting systems, including proposals about changes to it, so I upvoted your post.

However I disagree with this specific proposal, for it is quite reasonable that a good question, e.g. one that makes for good answers get a good rating too.

I must say OTOH, that I'm too astonished at the IMHO surprisingly high rate some relatively naive questions get, especially if compared to some of the answers themselves. I have already felt like posting something here on the subject too, but after all it must just be that my opinion on the subject differs from that of (a large part of) the community.

2) Points should not flow automatically unless they have contributed.
I disagree on this too, for the same reasons as pointed out by others here, i.e. fundamentally because it rates the involvement in the monastry's activities. I only would like to add that the points awarded this way are only a bunch and I wouldn't be concerned too much about this if I were you...
7) There is no specailized perl course in india , so please make people aware of any training programs if any worldwide. This will make more people to enter here and check out whats next on perl.

8) I suggest from the expertise you all have , you can form a team and get associated with some Indian Software firms to give training in perl and this can mint a lot for you and mean a lot for people like me.

All in all one thing that I do not like in your post is that it is about too many different issues that mostly have nothing to do each other.

In particular as far as the latter point is concerned, I do not think it's particularly on-topic anywhere in PM (but I would be pleased to be proved wrong).

Also, while both points arise from somewhat particular, localised needs related to your personal situation, for the former you broadened its scope as to propose something in relation with "training programs if any worldwide", i.e. so make it become possibly of general interest, while the latter is still confined in a local reality.

In reply to Re: RFC to site changes and XP changes by blazar
in thread RFC to site changes and XP changes by prad_intel

Title:
Use:  <p> text here (a paragraph) </p>
and:  <code> code here </code>
to format your post, it's "PerlMonks-approved HTML":


  • Posts are HTML formatted. Put <p> </p> tags around your paragraphs. Put <code> </code> tags around your code and data!
  • Titles consisting of a single word are discouraged, and in most cases are disallowed outright.
  • Read Where should I post X? if you're not absolutely sure you're posting in the right place.
  • Please read these before you post! —
  • Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags:
    a, abbr, b, big, blockquote, br, caption, center, col, colgroup, dd, del, details, div, dl, dt, em, font, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, hr, i, ins, li, ol, p, pre, readmore, small, span, spoiler, strike, strong, sub, summary, sup, table, tbody, td, tfoot, th, thead, tr, tt, u, ul, wbr
  • You may need to use entities for some characters, as follows. (Exception: Within code tags, you can put the characters literally.)
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Link using PerlMonks shortcuts! What shortcuts can I use for linking?
  • See Writeup Formatting Tips and other pages linked from there for more info.