Update: I wouldn't put money on the server sending back a 404 for a missing image, although any half-decent webmaster will do this (in addition to possibly supplying an error document), but I think you could rely on it for most applications. If you find this is not the case, I would think testing the mime type of the returned document would be more efficient than a HEAD request potentially followed by a GET.
In reply to Re: download JPG series with error-handling
by moot
in thread download JPG series with error-handling
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |