Surprised? Really? When the default response to most regular expression questions here seems to be "that is too greedy - insert a ? after the * or +, and then it'll work fine"? We've been burned by too much greediness, so it's really of little surprise that we don't think outside of our boxes ;-)
In reply to Re^2: matching operator question
by Tanktalus
in thread matching operator question
by redss
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |