That's only part of the issue, but no.
If you'd done a super search before asking, you would have proposed [^ :] instead, but would have still found *tons* of nodes.
- tye
In reply to Re^6: Perl 6 links (//)
by tye
in thread Perl 6 links
by Juerd
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |