I wonder why you defend an approach that is more complex, less efficient, and prone to a problem that is "almost guaranteed not to occur", when there is a simple approach that is guaranteed not to have such a problem?
-Colin.
WHITEPAGES.COM | INC
In reply to Re^4: Split without removing characters
by cmeyer
in thread Split without removing characters
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |