paco, as the "canonical monk", is very useful for documentation purposes. Not to be confused with the null monk, he is sort of like the monk equivalent of http://www.example.com. If he didn't already exist, I think we'd want to invent him.
Of course, if the much cherished prospect of paco's Second Coming ever became reality, he would cease to be the canonical monk, which may necessitate rewriting any docs that used him as such, but I think the general joy over his return would easily compensate for this small inconvenience.
the lowliest monk
In reply to Re: MonkReaper?!
by tlm
in thread MonkReaper?!
by anonymized user 468275
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |