tr doesn't take a list of scalars. What word do you suggest be used in place of "list" in the "list of characters" that tr has two of?A word that springs to mind and seems to capture the intended meaning is 'set', and perhaps, more correctly: 'ordered set'.
In reply to Re: (tye)Re: tr doesn't *really* use a list
by Anonymous Monk
in thread tr doesn't *really* use a list
by Boldra
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |