Errk. Can the people who don’t have a lot of PMs have a way to continue use the old interface? The new one is really confounding.
There are typically about 10 messages in mine, so I don’t need search or any fancy folder stuff. But I delete messages often, and doing so now involves a combobox. I think it’s enough to select “Move [selected] messages to [(deleted)]” and then tick off messages? Not obvious, though.
Shouldn’t “General” be called “Inbox”?
Choosing folders by twiddling the search stuff is confusing. When I moved a few messages into the Archives folder, I was momentarily puzzled at where they went and how I could get them back.
Sorry; the features are nice, I suppose (I’d need a while to figure out all the things I can do now), but that interface is just horrible.
Update: if I search for messages from an non-existant author, there is no notification, instead it simply lists everything.
Update 2: the “or with content” label is misleading, the search criteria are ANDed (the behaviour as is is preferrable; just the labelling is wrong).
Update 3: how do the “(trash-bag)” and “(deleted)” folders differ?
Makeshifts last the longest.
In reply to Re: Searchable Inbox
by Aristotle
in thread Searchable Inbox
by demerphq
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |