The problem with that first link is that its math is wrong. I definitely prefer its description of the problem contained there, but notice how it provides the same equation as the second link, but arrives at different results.
So I quickly tested the equation itself, and came up with the sequence found in your second link... and that became the basis for a "camel problem" poll.
Dave
In reply to Re^2: 2, 2, 2, 3, 7, 22, 83, ...
by davido
in thread 2, 2, 2, 3, 7, 22, 83, ...
by davido
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |