D'Oh! I forgot to -w when I tested it. It's incredible how annoying this little thing can be!!! All in all I would regard the assignment to @_ and the connected warning as spurious, since split is not called in void context. But... they're there!
In reply to Re^5: Counting the number of items returned by split without using a named array
by blazar
in thread Counting the number of items returned by split without using a named array
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |