Update:After checking the precedence, it's not really necessary to use 'and' instead of '&&' here, but to me it makes the intention more clear.
Ups! duh. missed the '== 0'. More coffee for me please.
In reply to Re: Works on one machine, fails on another
by runrig
in thread Works on one machine, fails on another
by Tuna
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |