So it appears we have yet another inconvenient and/or incomplete way to check whether something can be used as a hash.
The hash example was an analogy--an analogy of a different type of allomorphism already present in Perl 5.
In reply to Re^3: I don't understand UNIVERSAL::DOES() (hash method?!)
by chromatic
in thread I don't understand UNIVERSAL::DOES()
by rlb3
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |