I asked a similar question at the end of Re^5: Gratuitous use of Perl Prototypes but never received an answer.
Also, I originally used the same approach in Re: More functional programming utilities, but eventually decided for that purpose that multimap \( @a, @b, @c, @d, ... ); was preferable as it meant I could pass anonymous arrays and other similar constructs. Eg. multimap [...],[...];, whereas the prototype version insists upon real arrays.
In reply to Re: prototypes: so many \@'s?
by BrowserUk
in thread prototypes: so many \@'s?
by dk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |